WEBSITE SPEED OPTIMIZATION: QUOTE COMPARISON BRIEF
Prepared by Web Aloha | Updated 7 September 2026
Guide: https://webaloha.co/website-speed-optimization-cost/
Current packages: https://webaloha.co/website-speed-performance-optimization/#pricing

HOW TO USE
Fill in the shared brief once. Give the same version to each provider,
then duplicate the provider response for each quote. Blank fields mean
unconfirmed scope, not work included. Use public URLs; do not put passwords,
API keys, customer data, or payment details in this document.

SHARED SITE BRIEF
Website URL:
CMS/platform and theme/builder:
Hosting/CDN:
The visitor problem to fix:
Required functionality and integrations to preserve:
Representative URLs and journeys (e.g. service enquiry, product to checkout):
Recent changes that may affect measurements:
Staging, backup, deployment and rollback arrangements:
Requested deadline and known release restrictions:

BASELINE TO USE FOR EVERY QUOTE
Test date and representative URLs:
Lab tool/version, device, network and test location:
Number of runs and comparison method:
Observed loading, interaction or layout problem:
Field-data source, date window, and page/origin scope (or unavailable):
Links to saved reports/screenshots:

PROVIDER RESPONSE (DUPLICATE FOR EACH QUOTE)
Provider and quote date:
Approach: targeted repair / broader optimization / rebuild or migration
Price and currency:
Tax treatment:
One-time implementation included:
Separate recurring hosting, CDN, plugin or maintenance charges:
Payment stages and quote validity:
Included URLs, templates and user journeys:
Verified bottlenecks and proposed changes:
Access/dependencies required from us:
Explicit exclusions and remaining constraints:
If rebuilding: content/URL inventory, redirects and integration scope:
Schedule: baseline / implementation / QA / release / handoff
Acceptance criteria and same-condition before/after evidence:
Functional checks: navigation, forms, consent, analytics, cart/payments
Rollback plan and responsible person:
Handoff documentation and monitoring owner:
Follow-up scope, timing and any additional fee:
Policy for regressions and newly discovered work:

COMPARE BEFORE APPROVING
[ ] All providers priced the same templates and journeys.
[ ] Differences in implementation, testing and exclusions are explicit.
[ ] One-time and recurring costs are separate.
[ ] Lab results and real-user field measurements are distinguished.
[ ] Required business functions will be checked after changes.
[ ] Before/after reports will use the agreed method.
[ ] Remaining constraints and ongoing ownership are documented.
[ ] Any rebuild quote includes migration and cutover responsibilities.

DECISION
Selected approach/provider:
Why it fits the problem and operating model:
Open questions to resolve before approval:

This is a comparison aid, not a quote or a list of promised inclusions.